Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 10:00:09 -0500
From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
To: Andrej =?utf-8?B?VmxhxaFpxIc=?= <andrej.vlasic0@gmail.com>
Cc: wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Croatia (HR)
Message-ID: <20151022150009.GA116932@ubuntu-hedt> (sfid-20151022_170036_346826_6F17752A)
References: <1444761084-4399-1-git-send-email-andrej.vlasic0@gmail.com>
 <20151015180408.GA31612@ubuntu-hedt>
 <CAAudh+8q-7-Wz5B5hZ+hePJ-7=QNbbpVoc7Xpf4jsmKBqvkXfQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
In-Reply-To: <CAAudh+8q-7-Wz5B5hZ+hePJ-7=QNbbpVoc7Xpf4jsmKBqvkXfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 09:44:19PM +0200, Andrej Vlašić wrote:
> On 15 October 2015 at 20:04, Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 08:31:24PM +0200, Andrej Vlasic wrote:
> >> Update frequency allocation rules to mach data from table [1].
> >>
> >> Also increase allowed power limit for range 5150-5250 Mhz to 200mW.
> >>
> >> [1] http://tablice.hakom.hr:8280/vis?lang=en
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrej Vlasic <andrej.vlasic0@gmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  db.txt | 14 ++++++++++----
> >>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt
> >> index d57ea84..3b36616 100644
> >> --- a/db.txt
> >> +++ b/db.txt
> >> @@ -504,11 +504,17 @@ country HN: DFS-FCC
> >>       (5490 - 5730 @ 160), (24), DFS
> >>       (5735 - 5835 @ 80), (30)
> >>
> >> +# Data from table of frequency allocations: http://tablice.hakom.hr:8280/vis?lang=en
> >> +# For 5ghz range see http://www.hakom.hr/UserDocsImages/op%C4%87e%20dozvole%20prosinac%202009.g/Opca_dozvola_85.pdf
> >> +# and http://www.hakom.hr/UserDocsImages/op%C4%87e%20dozvole%20prosinac%202009.g/Opca_dozvola_86.pdf
> >> +# and http://www.hakom.hr/UserDocsImages/op%C4%87e%20dozvole%20prosinac%202009.g/Opca_dozvola_87.pdf
> >> +# TPC devices on range 5250-5350 can use 200mW, and 1W on range 5470-5725.
> >> +
> >>  country HR: DFS-ETSI
> >> -     (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (20)
> >> -     (5170 - 5250 @ 80), (20), AUTO-BW
> >> -     (5250 - 5330 @ 80), (20), DFS, AUTO-BW
> >> -     (5490 - 5710 @ 160), (27), DFS
> >> +     (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (100 mW)
> >> +     (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW
> >> +     (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (100 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS, AUTO-BW
> >> +     (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (500 mW), DFS
> >>       # 60 gHz band channels 1-4, ref: Etsi En 302 567
> >>       (57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40)
> >
> > In general the changes look okay to me and in line with the published
> > regulations (I couldn't read some of the documents you linked to, but
> > the limits do look to be in line with ERC/DEC/(01)07 and ECC/DEC/(04)08
> > which are referenced by the frequency allocation table).
> >
> > It seems pretty arbitrary to change from dBm to mW however, especially
> > for those rules whose power limit isn't actually changing. I'd prefer we
> > leave them in dBm for consistency, in which case I think we end up with:
> >
> > country HR: DFS-ETSI
> >         (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (20)
> >         (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (23), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW
> >         (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (20), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS, AUTO-BW
> >         (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (27), DFS
> >         # 60 gHz band channels 1-4, ref: Etsi En 302 567
> >         (57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40)
> >
> > If that looks fine to you then I can fix it up when I apply the patch.
> 
> It's fine with me too like that.

Applied with the discussed changes. Thanks!