Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.220.42]:33394 "EHLO mail-pa0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751783AbbKKAhe (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 19:37:34 -0500 Received: by pabfh17 with SMTP id fh17so13101393pab.0 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:37:34 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] wcn3620: use new response format for wcn3620 trigger_ba To: Bob Copeland References: <1447063362-27322-1-git-send-email-fengwei.yin@linaro.org> <1447063362-27322-5-git-send-email-fengwei.yin@linaro.org> <20151109154040.GD5395@localhost> <56419805.4090902@linaro.org> <20151110141336.GF5395@localhost> Cc: andy.green@linaro.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, wcn36xx@lists.infradead.org, k.eugene.e@gmail.com, bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com From: "fengwei.yin" Message-ID: <56428DC7.6050009@linaro.org> (sfid-20151111_013737_696953_C5435CB8) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 08:37:27 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151110141336.GF5395@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Bob, On 2015/11/10 22:13, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:08:53PM +0800, fengwei.yin wrote: >> Even on 3620, not all cmds switch to wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2. >> And I don't think wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2 should bind to 3620 (it >> may be related with firmware). >> >> In patch v2, the wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2 is not bind to 3620. If >> you could test on none-3620 platform (I don't have none-3620 plafrom), that >> will be great. > > Sure, I'll take a look today or tomorrow on my hardware. Thanks a lot. >