Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:51191 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754064AbbKQOHS (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2015 09:07:18 -0500 From: Kalle Valo To: "John W. Linville" Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Berg Subject: Re: linux-wireless rebased (probably for the last time) on 4.4-rc1 References: <20151116195551.GD8895@tuxdriver.com> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 16:07:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20151116195551.GD8895@tuxdriver.com> (John W. Linville's message of "Mon, 16 Nov 2015 14:55:53 -0500") Message-ID: <87oaesyb1s.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20151117_150733_412548_00D4A062) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: "John W. Linville" writes: > The wireless-testing tree has been rebased on top of 4.4-rc1. The > current head of the tree is eced3b090878ddba643bbed599e6edea4ad90f49. > Please update any downstream trees accordingly! > > It has been almost a year since I turned-over wireless maintenance > duties to Johannes and Kalle. At that time I agreed to continue > maintaining the wireless-testing tree for the duration of 2015 to help > those that were still relying on it. The end of 2015 is coming soon, > and with it I intend to stop maintaining wireless-testing. > > If you are still relying on wireless-testing, then I implore you to > find another option to satisfy your needs. If someone would like to > continue maintaining wireless-testing yourself, then please contact > me and I will attempt to assist you in such a transition. > > Thanks for all the fish! Thank you John. I have been using wireless-testing in my main laptop for god knows how many years and I hate to see it go. I consider it as the safest way to test the latest wireless code as it's just the latest -rc release from Linux plus mac80211 and wireless-drivers trees. linux-next is just too experimental for me, I don't want that anywhere near my laptop :) It would be interesting to know what others think about wireless-testing and how much users that tree really has? I hope we can find some solution and wireless-testing continues to exist. Otherwise testing latest wireless code will become more difficult. -- Kalle Valo