Return-path: Received: from mail-qg0-f46.google.com ([209.85.192.46]:33418 "EHLO mail-qg0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752191AbbKSRlJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:41:09 -0500 Received: by qgea14 with SMTP id a14so55941215qge.0 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 09:41:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:41:07 -0500 From: Bob Copeland To: yfw Cc: andy.green@linaro.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, wcn36xx@lists.infradead.org, k.eugene.e@gmail.com, bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] wcn3620: use new response format for wcn3620 trigger_ba Message-ID: <20151119174107.GB12931@localhost> (sfid-20151119_184113_858804_03C8CD03) References: <1447063362-27322-1-git-send-email-fengwei.yin@linaro.org> <1447063362-27322-5-git-send-email-fengwei.yin@linaro.org> <20151109154040.GD5395@localhost> <56419805.4090902@linaro.org> <20151110141336.GF5395@localhost> <564D3FEE.1000208@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <564D3FEE.1000208@linaro.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:20:14AM +0800, yfw wrote: > Hi Bob, > > On 2015年11月10日 22:13, Bob Copeland wrote: > >On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:08:53PM +0800, fengwei.yin wrote: > >>Even on 3620, not all cmds switch to wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2. > >>And I don't think wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2 should bind to 3620 (it > >>may be related with firmware). > >> > >>In patch v2, the wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2 is not bind to 3620. If > >>you could test on none-3620 platform (I don't have none-3620 plafrom), that > >>will be great. > > > >Sure, I'll take a look today or tomorrow on my hardware. > > > > Ping... Oops, sorry. I can confirm my hardware uses this format. Turns out, in my backports snapshot I was already carrying a patch for it: https://github.com/KrasnikovEugene/wcn36xx/commit/7d41270b8c3eee0f72713b4553ca047807c0a00e -- Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/