Return-path: Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.220.49]:36660 "EHLO mail-pa0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751600AbbKSDUV (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Nov 2015 22:20:21 -0500 Received: by pacdm15 with SMTP id dm15so65642663pac.3 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:20:21 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] wcn3620: use new response format for wcn3620 trigger_ba To: Bob Copeland References: <1447063362-27322-1-git-send-email-fengwei.yin@linaro.org> <1447063362-27322-5-git-send-email-fengwei.yin@linaro.org> <20151109154040.GD5395@localhost> <56419805.4090902@linaro.org> <20151110141336.GF5395@localhost> Cc: andy.green@linaro.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, wcn36xx@lists.infradead.org, k.eugene.e@gmail.com, bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com From: yfw Message-ID: <564D3FEE.1000208@linaro.org> (sfid-20151119_042024_949078_5822D8FF) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:20:14 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151110141336.GF5395@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Bob, On 2015年11月10日 22:13, Bob Copeland wrote: > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:08:53PM +0800, fengwei.yin wrote: >> Even on 3620, not all cmds switch to wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2. >> And I don't think wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2 should bind to 3620 (it >> may be related with firmware). >> >> In patch v2, the wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2 is not bind to 3620. If >> you could test on none-3620 platform (I don't have none-3620 plafrom), that >> will be great. > > Sure, I'll take a look today or tomorrow on my hardware. > Ping... Regards Yin, Fengwei