Return-path: Received: from mail-qg0-f50.google.com ([209.85.192.50]:35433 "EHLO mail-qg0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752323AbbKJONw (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:13:52 -0500 Received: by qgec40 with SMTP id c40so111159112qge.2 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 06:13:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:13:36 -0500 From: Bob Copeland To: "fengwei.yin" Cc: andy.green@linaro.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, wcn36xx@lists.infradead.org, k.eugene.e@gmail.com, bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] wcn3620: use new response format for wcn3620 trigger_ba Message-ID: <20151110141336.GF5395@localhost> (sfid-20151110_151356_149646_FE26A2A4) References: <1447063362-27322-1-git-send-email-fengwei.yin@linaro.org> <1447063362-27322-5-git-send-email-fengwei.yin@linaro.org> <20151109154040.GD5395@localhost> <56419805.4090902@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <56419805.4090902@linaro.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:08:53PM +0800, fengwei.yin wrote: > Even on 3620, not all cmds switch to wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2. > And I don't think wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2 should bind to 3620 (it > may be related with firmware). > > In patch v2, the wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2 is not bind to 3620. If > you could test on none-3620 platform (I don't have none-3620 plafrom), that > will be great. Sure, I'll take a look today or tomorrow on my hardware. -- Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/