Return-path: Received: from mail-lb0-f169.google.com ([209.85.217.169]:32949 "EHLO mail-lb0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751846AbbLPHwk (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2015 02:52:40 -0500 Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id kw15so20493597lbb.0 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 23:52:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1450082912.3871.2.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <1449876779.2324.16.camel@sipsolutions.net> <566DF964.7050904@broadcom.com> <0BA3FCBA62E2DC44AF3030971E174FB32E919DE2@hasmsx107.ger.corp.intel.com> <1450082912.3871.2.camel@sipsolutions.net> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:52:39 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20151216_085247_031248_87A63D01) Subject: Re: iwlwifi - L1 Enabled - LTR Enabled loop From: Emmanuel Grumbach To: Johannes Berg Cc: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" , Arend van Spriel , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , linuxwifi , linux-wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2015-12-14 at 04:00 +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote: >> >> This is really weird. I don't see how that could be firmware related. >> BTW, -10.ucode is fairly old :) we have -16.ucode out there. > > I guess the question is how we get into this situation to start with? > > About the only thing I can imagine is that we fail somehow during > initialization (without printing any other message) and higher layers > like wpa_supplicant/network-manager/... simply try to bring up the > device over and over again? > I can reproduce this now when I unload / load iwlwifi until I kill the supplicant. Seems like the wpa_s is indeed toggling the device. I don't have time to play with that right now.