Return-path: Received: from mail.sig21.net ([80.244.240.74]:46775 "EHLO mail.sig21.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751906AbbLPWBt (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:01:49 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 22:24:25 +0100 From: Johannes Stezenbach To: Felix Fietkau Cc: Jakub =?utf-8?B?S2ljacWEc2tp?= , Tuomas =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E4s=E4nen?= , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, tuomasjjrasanen@opinsys.fi, Linus Walleij Subject: Re: About adding support for MT76x2U to Linux kernel Message-ID: <20151216212425.GA25906@sig21.net> (sfid-20151216_230152_577506_1E44FD65) References: <20150814081526.GC20192@hackpad.Elisa> <20150814143229.61440072@north> <5671B310.2080200@openwrt.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <5671B310.2080200@openwrt.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 07:53:04PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote: > Once I'm done with mt7603 bringup (monitor mode rx already works), I > plan on submitting mt76 upstream, and then we can see about adding > support for 76x2u, or even merging the hardware support for mt7601u. > > You can check out my work in the mt7603 branch here: > https://github.com/openwrt/mt76/tree/mt7603 let me chime in to say that I'm interested to work on support for mt7610u (TP-LINK Archer T2U/T2UH). https://wikidevi.com/wiki/TP-LINK_Archer_T2U I'm facing the same question as Tuomas about using mt76 or mt7601u as the base? Johannes