Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f169.google.com ([209.85.213.169]:34587 "EHLO mail-ig0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756564AbbLHNVg (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Dec 2015 08:21:36 -0500 Received: by igvg19 with SMTP id g19so101094209igv.1 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 05:21:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 08:21:31 -0500 From: Bob Copeland To: "John W. Linville" Cc: Kalle Valo , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: wireless-testing rebased, new HEAD commit f5feec4244464225c03ccc9ddad615cb43a044cc Message-ID: <20151208132131.GA12251@localhost> (sfid-20151208_142353_076433_68F8F80A) References: <87fuzkf2ef.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <20151207193910.GB27529@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20151207193910.GB27529@tuxdriver.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:39:11PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote: > All, > > An earlier pull got a version of mac80211.git that was later reverted. > Unfortunately, the intervening merges got things so screwed-up I > couldn't reasonably unravel them. So, I have taken the somewhat > unusual step of rebasing wireless-testing here in the middle of the > 4.4 stream. For this reason, we are considering making the new wireless-testing rebase the feeder trees for each build instead of once per cycle, similarly to how linux-next is built. For most users, the main difference will behaving to remember to 'git pull --rebase' instead of just 'git pull'. If there are users that rely on the merging-type workflow, could you weigh in on whether that is a strong requirement? I'm running this in test-pilot mode now at its eventual home; comments welcome: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wireless/wireless-testing.git -- Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/