Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:34214 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753719AbbLCUYI (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2015 15:24:08 -0500 Message-ID: <1449174245.31265.4.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20151203_212411_995514_8784F610) Subject: Re: Can we increase IEEE80211_MAX_QUEUES From: Johannes Berg To: Ben Greear , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 21:24:05 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1449174081.31265.3.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20151203_212138_334045_9AA12B0C) References: <5660A31E.3010507@candelatech.com> (sfid-20151203_211637_306021_AF98F120) <1449174081.31265.3.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20151203_212138_334045_9AA12B0C) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2015-12-03 at 21:21 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: >  > Does the original premise even make sense though? A single queue for > each vdev seems a bit strange. > Btw, it might make more sense to use Felix's txq scheduling thing for this, where you get a txq for each station. You can still combine them back any way you want in the driver. johannes