Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:46636 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932776AbcASUoz (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jan 2016 15:44:55 -0500 Message-ID: <1453236291.25499.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20160119_214518_560198_153E951F) Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] rfkill: Remove obsolete "state" sysfs interface From: Johannes Berg To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o?= Paulo Rechi Vita Cc: Marcel Holtmann , linux-wireless , "David S. Miller" , Network Development , LKML , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o?= Paulo Rechi Vita , linux@endlessm.com Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 21:44:51 +0100 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20160119_213710_142942_A54A4B35) References: <1453218163-31998-1-git-send-email-jprvita@endlessm.com> <1453218163-31998-6-git-send-email-jprvita@endlessm.com> <1453234505.23600.6.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20160119_213710_142942_A54A4B35) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 15:36 -0500, João Paulo Rechi Vita wrote: >  > > I suspect that nevertheless, we can't just remove it - Googling > > around shows quite a bit of (e.g. Android) code using it. > > > > Should I update the expected removal date to 2018, or some other time > in the future? Or if this is not going to be removed at all, > shouldn't it be moved back to stable? > Yeah, maybe we should just move it back. The problem with it is that it doesn't fully reflect the state (both sw+hw blocked can't be reflected) but if the current users are happy with it then that's not really a problem. johannes