MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5688EBAC.5000701@gmail.com>
References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net>
	<5686F0B2.5000000@users.sourceforge.net>
	<56870866.7020000@cogentembedded.com>
	<568785B3.5000905@users.sourceforge.net>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1601020914100.2063@localhost6.localdomain6>
	<5687939E.7010701@users.sourceforge.net>
	<5687A2C7.3000704@gmail.com>
	<5687B2BC.8090901@users.sourceforge.net>
	<5688EBAC.5000701@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 16:18:11 +0100
Message-ID: <CACna6rzoJLRuTTDi3JjXg1roDbk3HXcBhhe0iOUH9xRaGU5p7A@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20160103_161920_208866_CADC4179)
Subject: Re: net-libertas: Better exception handling in if_spi_host_to_card_worker()
From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= <zajec5@gmail.com>
To: Arend van Spriel <aspriel@gmail.com>
Cc: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
	libertas-dev@lists.infradead.org,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org

On 3 January 2016 at 10:36, Arend van Spriel <aspriel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 02-01-16 12:21, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>>> Did you look at the resulting assembly code for different target architectures?
>>
>> Not yet. - Which execution system variants would you recommend for
>> further comparisons?
>
> Guess x86{,_64} and arm would be good candidates, ie. CISC vs. RISC.

Oh, don't forget about MIPS with its fancy branches handling. You know
about it, don't you?

I'm against this patch as well.

-- 
Rafał