Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:60173 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965064AbcAUO6t (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:58:49 -0500 Received: from potku.adurom.net (a88-115-185-251.elisa-laajakaista.fi [88.115.185.251]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kvalo@smtp.codeaurora.org) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EE5B6037C for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 14:58:48 +0000 (UTC) From: Kalle Valo To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: wireless-drivers: random cleanup patches piling up Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:58:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87wpr3x9ln.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20160121_155854_644978_1153FC7B) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, I have quite a lot of random cleanup patches from new developers waiting in my queue: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/?state=10&delegate=25621&order=date (Not all of them are cleanup patches, there are also few patches deferred due to other reasons, but you get the idea.) These cleanup patches usually take quite a lot of my time and I'm starting to doubt the benefit, compared to the time needed to dig through them and figuring out what to apply. And this is of course time away from other patches, so it's slowing down "real" development. I really don't know what to do. Part of me is saying that I just should drop them unless it's reviewed by a more experienced developer but on the other hand this is a good way get new developers onboard. What others think? Are these kind of patches useful? -- Kalle Valo