Return-path: Received: from softlayer.compulab.co.il ([50.23.254.55]:48943 "EHLO compulab.co.il" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752218AbcAMGAp (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jan 2016 01:00:45 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] wlcore/wl12xx: spi: add wifi support to cm-t335 To: Kalle Valo , Uri Mashiach References: <1451482533-8624-1-git-send-email-uri.mashiach@compulab.co.il> <1451482533-8624-4-git-send-email-uri.mashiach@compulab.co.il> <87io35lq2p.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Cc: Rob Herring , Tony Lindgren , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , bcousson@baylibre.com, Eliad Peller , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org From: Igor Grinberg Message-ID: <5695E802.7050909@compulab.co.il> (sfid-20160113_070054_146114_EEBEC5F9) Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 08:00:34 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87io35lq2p.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Kalle Valo, On 01/07/16 11:02, Kalle Valo wrote: > Uri Mashiach writes: > >> Device tree modifications: >> - Pinmux for SPI0 and WiFi GPIOs. >> - SPI0 node with wlcore as a child node. >> >> Cc: Tony Lindgren >> Signed-off-by: Uri Mashiach >> --- Uri, please document the dependencies next time. Thanks! >> v1 -> v2: Replace interrupts and interrupt-parent with interrupts-extended. >> v2 -> v3: Move the pinctrl-0 = <&wifi_pins> to the wlcore node. >> v3 -> v4: replace interrupts-extended with interrupts and interrupt-parent. (revert v2 modification). >> According to Rob Herring and Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/interrupts.txt, >> interrupts-extended should only be used when a device has multiple interrupt parents. >> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-cm-t335.dts | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+) > > To what tree should this patch go? My wireless-drivers-next tree doesn't > even have this file. Right. It will hit the mainline during this merge window through Tony's and arm-soc trees. Do you think it will be sensible if you take 1/3 and 2/3 patches and Tony will take the 3/3 (there is no code dependency between first two and the last one), or we can just wait till arm-soc hits the mainline, so you will have the needed code? > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7933441/ > -- Regards, Igor.