Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55435 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756097AbcBJCAI (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2016 21:00:08 -0500 From: Jes Sorensen To: Larry Finger Cc: Drunk Cat , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: alfa awus036nhr v2 and module rtl8xxxu References: <56B38CDF.9010806@lwfinger.net> <56BA8E5D.5090402@lwfinger.net> Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2016 21:00:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <56BA8E5D.5090402@lwfinger.net> (Larry Finger's message of "Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:11:57 -0600") Message-ID: (sfid-20160210_030012_386049_4A0E149E) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Larry Finger writes: > On 02/09/2016 03:00 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote: >> Jes Sorensen writes: >>> Larry Finger writes: >>>> I can confirm what Drunk Cat sees. There is something different about >>>> the RTL8192RU as using the iwconfig utility shows no APs in the >>>> scan. I hope to get to debugging the problem soon. >>> >>> OK - thats unfortunate. Most likely the wrong antenna path is being >>> enabled for it, or something like that. >>> >>> Once I finish up the 8723bu/8192eu patchset, I'll try to find some time >>> to look at it, if you don't nail it before. >> >> One more time with the actual patch ... > > No help. The name of the patch makes it sound as if it is for a 1T2R > device. The RTL8188RU is 1x1. Darn, I didn't have an 8188RU near me when I discovered that bug and so I wasn't sure if it was 1T2R or 1T1R. All my other 1T1R parts work fine with the current code. Cheers, Jes