Return-path: Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.135]:56496 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751110AbcBWKPm (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Feb 2016 05:15:42 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Johannes Berg Cc: Thierry Reding , Heikki Krogerus , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Courbot , Stephen Warren , Marc Dietrich Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/4] ARM: tegra: use build-in device properties with rfkill_gpio Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:15:31 +0100 Message-ID: <5438459.Mb6Ga2Xhyq@wuerfel> (sfid-20160223_111610_131087_24A2182C) In-Reply-To: <1455825889.2084.16.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <1453712629-143317-1-git-send-email-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> <1453797724.2759.4.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1455825889.2084.16.camel@sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thursday 18 February 2016 21:04:49 Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 09:42 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 13:18 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > > > Johannes, I assume that you'll want to take this through your tree > > > because of the dependency? In that case: > > > > > > Acked-by: Thierry Reding > > > > I can, but I don't really care - perhaps you'd rather take the entire > > series through your tree to get it into one place for Marc? > > > > In which case, you have my > > > > Acked-by: Johannes Berg > > > > for the other 3 patches. > > > > Let me know which you prefer. > > > Did these patches get applied anywhere? Otherwise I'm willing to pick > them up. > Fine with me too: Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann Just for my curiosity: what is the difference between a rfkill-gpio device and a gpio-keys device with a KEY_RFKILL code? arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm4708-netgear-r6250.dts and others seem to do the second approach in DT so they don't need to create the platform device. Arnd