Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52279 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751716AbcCJOMK (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Mar 2016 09:12:10 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 15:09:56 +0100 From: Stanislaw Gruszka To: Larry Finger Cc: linux-wireless , Helmut Schaa , dan.g.tob@gmail.com Subject: Re: New firmware for RT2870 Message-ID: <20160310140955.GA17840@redhat.com> (sfid-20160310_151215_276519_D5A756C5) References: <56E08615.9060208@lwfinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <56E08615.9060208@lwfinger.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 02:22:45PM -0600, Larry Finger wrote: > In https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114151, the OP reports > improved stability and performance for an RT5370 using a newer firmware that > came with the driver CD. The logs show this to be version 0.36, whereas the > version now in linux-firmware is version 0.29. > > I downloaded the firmware from b.k.o. It had very little effect on my > no-name adapter with ID 148f:3070. It still gets ping losses of 10-15%. > > Should this new version be submitted to linux-firmware? Its provenance seems > to be sketchy, but submission would likely be legal. I do not see any reason not to update ralink firmwares in linux-firmware git tree, however IIRC linux-firmware maintainers prefer to firmware submission was performed from vendor email addresses. Stanislaw