Return-path: Received: from mail-qk0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:35193 "EHLO mail-qk0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933380AbcCPSzj (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:55:39 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id o6so25089967qkc.2 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:55:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:55:31 -0400 From: Bob Copeland To: Dave Taht Cc: Michal Kazior , linux-wireless , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" , Network Development , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, "codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [RFCv2 0/3] mac80211: implement fq codel Message-ID: <20160316185531.GA1771@localhost> (sfid-20160316_195543_756737_926AF280) References: <1458123478-1795-1-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:36:31AM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: > That is the sanest 802.11e queue behavior I have ever seen! (at both > 6 and 300mbit! in the ath10k patched mac test) Out of curiosity, why does BE have larger latency than BK in that chart? I'd have expected the opposite. -- Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/