Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:45204 "EHLO
	out2-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751622AbcCZQqp (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 26 Mar 2016 12:46:45 -0400
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45])
	by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C5B20831
	for <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>; Sat, 26 Mar 2016 12:46:43 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2016 09:46:42 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Till Kamppeter <till.kamppeter@gmail.com>
Cc: Evgeny Novikov <novikov@ispras.ru>,
	Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>,
	"lsb-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<lsb-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Open Printing <printing-architecture@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	chris holcombe <chris.holcombe@canonical.com>,
	Chris MacNaughton <chris.macnaughton@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [lsb-discuss] Google Summer of Code 2016 - Many new applications
Message-ID: <20160326164642.GA26523@kroah.com> (sfid-20160326_174651_015023_6BFCE548)
References: <56F4266B.4060605@gmail.com>
 <1943931458892174@web3o.yandex.ru>
 <56F5D04A.20506@gmail.com>
 <56F5D11B.7000803@gmail.com>
 <20160326001803.GB15767@kroah.com>
 <56F5DA55.6030802@gmail.com>
 <20160326141540.GA4104@kroah.com>
 <56F69BDC.7050900@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <56F69BDC.7050900@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 11:25:32AM -0300, Till Kamppeter wrote:
> On 03/26/2016 11:15 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >>Which one?
> >
> >This one:
> >	https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/dashboard/organization/6564234674569216/proposal/6320691074826240/
> >
> >>And are then all the other kernel-related applications to be ignored?
> >
> >I just went through them all again and left comments saying that they
> >were not even a valid proposal, so yes, I don't see anything I can even
> >consider for the kernel other than the above proposal.
> 
> Thank you very much. I have marked it with a star.
> 
> Can you look for a co-mentor and ask him for clicking "WANT TO MENTOR" on
> this, too?

I will look for one this week, but I can't count on finding one :)

> Can you give me a list of all the other proposals which you considered not
> worthwhile (and where we do not need to wait for another mentor's opinion)
> so that I can mark them ignored?

Ok, will go through them now...