Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:34269 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753536AbcCILie (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2016 06:38:34 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:08:12 +0530 From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan To: Johannes Berg Cc: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, kvalo@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cfg80211/nl80211: Add support for NL80211_STA_INFO_RX_DURATION Message-ID: <20160309113812.GA7581@atheros-ThinkPad-T61> (sfid-20160309_123837_315025_E8B9FBED) References: <1457508003-16700-1-git-send-email-mohammed@qca.qualcomm.com> <1457515803.2042.1.camel@sipsolutions.net> <20160309093845.GA6695@atheros-ThinkPad-T61> <1457517488.2042.2.camel@sipsolutions.net> <20160309105231.GA7145@atheros-ThinkPad-T61> <1457522305.2042.3.camel@sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: <1457522305.2042.3.camel@sipsolutions.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 12:18:25PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 16:22 +0530, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote: > >? > > [shafi] ath10k implementation is based on PPDU duration calculation > > and it does not includes any IFS duration. > > > > So 'Energy' (time spent by the radio on receiving frames from a > > particular peer) makes more sense right ? > > > > Fine with me, perhaps just saying "aggregate PPDU duration" would be a > good thing? > [shafi] thanks johannes, fine with me and I also confirmed with the person who implemented this for ath10k, she is also fine with this definition as well. I will send a v3 updating the same as below: "@rx_duration: aggregate PPDU duration(usecs) for all the frames from a peer" regards shafi