Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:59204 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752408AbcCIKwq (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2016 05:52:46 -0500 Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 16:22:31 +0530 From: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan To: Johannes Berg Cc: Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, kvalo@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cfg80211/nl80211: Add support for NL80211_STA_INFO_RX_DURATION Message-ID: <20160309105231.GA7145@atheros-ThinkPad-T61> (sfid-20160309_115250_437302_7FE7EBA1) References: <1457508003-16700-1-git-send-email-mohammed@qca.qualcomm.com> <1457515803.2042.1.camel@sipsolutions.net> <20160309093845.GA6695@atheros-ThinkPad-T61> <1457517488.2042.2.camel@sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: <1457517488.2042.2.camel@sipsolutions.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Johannes, On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:58:08AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 15:08 +0530, Mohammed Shafi Shajakhan wrote: > > > [shafi] Please suggest if this is ok ? I will be thankful > > if you can suggest a better one if this is not ok > > > > * @rx_duration: approximate total air time(usecs) for all the > > ?frames from a peer > > > > That seems fine. We should perhaps specify the meaning of "air time" > though. Is it allocated NAV time, or is it just time in which there was > energy? With or without any IFS? > [shafi] ath10k implementation is based on PPDU duration calculation and it does not includes any IFS duration. So 'Energy' (time spent by the radio on receiving frames from a particular peer) makes more sense right ? regards, shafi