Return-path: Received: from g9t1613g.houston.hp.com ([15.240.0.71]:41029 "EHLO g9t1613g.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S967359AbcCQRYw (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2016 13:24:52 -0400 Subject: Re: [Codel] [RFCv2 0/3] mac80211: implement fq codel To: Dave Taht , Michal Kazior References: <1458123478-1795-1-git-send-email-michal.kazior@tieto.com> <20160316185531.GA1771@localhost> Cc: Network Development , linux-wireless , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" , Jasmine Strong , "codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" , make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net From: Rick Jones Message-ID: <56EAE85F.3010407@hpe.com> (sfid-20160317_182457_240634_E47A591A) Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 10:24:47 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/17/2016 10:00 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > netperf's udp_rr is not how much traffic conventionally behaves. It > doesn't do tcp slow start or congestion control in particular... Nor would one expect it to need to, unless one were using "burst mode" to have more than one transaction inflight at one time. And unless one uses the test-specific -e option to provide a very crude retransmission mechanism based on a socket read timeout, neither does UDP_RR recover from lost datagrams. happy benchmarking, rick jones http://www.netperf.org/