Return-path: Received: from smtprelay0160.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.160]:51898 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751087AbcCRR3o (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:29:44 -0400 Message-ID: <1458322179.26915.2.camel@perches.com> (sfid-20160318_183006_405530_E57E0227) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: fix order of flag descriptions From: Joe Perches To: Luis de Bethencourt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net, davem@davemloft.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:29:39 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1458318955-32070-1-git-send-email-luisbg@osg.samsung.com> References: <1458317369-28185-1-git-send-email-luisbg@osg.samsung.com> <1458318955-32070-1-git-send-email-luisbg@osg.samsung.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 16:35 +0000, Luis de Bethencourt wrote: > Fix order of mac80211_rx_flags description to match the enum. > > Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt > --- > Hi, > > I want ahead and fixed the order of the descriptions. checkpatch.pl was giving > a warning to my previous patch and I had a hunch it was because the wrong order > breaks the parser. Indeed it does and with this patch below checkpatch.pl does > not complain about this flag descriptions anymore. checkpatch complains? ?About what?