Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]:42542 "EHLO mail2.candelatech.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964951AbcDLXsj (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Apr 2016 19:48:39 -0400 Received: from [192.168.100.149] (firewall.candelatech.com [50.251.239.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.candelatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84DBC40ECA9 for ; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:48:38 -0700 (PDT) To: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" From: Ben Greear Subject: General VHT rate-ctrl question Message-ID: <570D8956.8090806@candelatech.com> (sfid-20160413_014843_049708_B2F53AD9) Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 16:48:38 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: If a station and it's peer can both do VHT, is there ever a good reason to even try HT rates? Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com