Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from slowthinkers.net ([82.95.118.26]:43880 "EHLO
	density.slowthinkers.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753937AbcDVRMn (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 22 Apr 2016 13:12:43 -0400
From: Anne Marcel Roorda <marcel@density.slowthinkers.net>
To: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Update regulatory rules for NL as per ETSI EN 300 440-1
In-reply-to: <20160422135529.GA109717@ubuntu-hedt>
References: <20160422123614.2B4EC2063D@density.slowthinkers.net> <20160422135529.GA109717@ubuntu-hedt>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 19:12:35 +0200
Message-Id: <20160422171236.600332063D@density.slowthinkers.net> (sfid-20160422_191250_102054_C2B52E42)
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>


In message <20160422135529.GA109717@ubuntu-hedt>, Seth Forshee writes:

<Snip>

> I'm looking at the document you reference as translated by Google, and
> I'm not seeing anything there to support these changes. I can't find any
> reference to ETSI 300 440-1. The section which would appear to apply
> here (article 2 paragraph o) references Annex 11 for permitted frequency
> bands, and this does not include the range that you're adding.
> 
> I didn't read the document in its entirety though, so I may have missed
> something. If so, could you please point me to the specific section
> which would permit operation in that range?

  Please see "Bijlage 11" (Non specific SRD) Nr. J.

Thanks,

- marcel