Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-f42.google.com ([209.85.218.42]:35995 "EHLO mail-oi0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752247AbcDHA4m (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Apr 2016 20:56:42 -0400 Received: by mail-oi0-f42.google.com with SMTP id y204so119780059oie.3 for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 17:56:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87pou11ikg.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> References: <871t6h4o6q.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> <87pou11ikg.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> From: Julian Calaby Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 10:56:22 +1000 Message-ID: (sfid-20160408_025646_777421_C94575A0) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/19] Pending Cleanup patches for 4.7 To: Kalle Valo Cc: Alexander Tsoy , Alexey Khoroshilov , Andrea Merello , Arend van Spriel , Arnd Bergmann , ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, b43-dev , brcm80211 development , Brett Rudley , Byeoungwook Kim , Chaoming Li , Colin Ian King , Dan Carpenter , Eliad Peller , Emmanuel Grumbach , Eyal Reizer , Franky Lin , Geliang Tang , Hans Ulli Kroll , Hante Meuleman , Ivan Safonov , Jia-Ju Bai , Johannes Berg , Larry Finger , Lars-Peter Clausen , linux-wireless , Luciano Coelho , Luis Felipe Dominguez Vega , Markus Elfring , Miaoqing Pan , Nicholas Mc Guire , Nicolas Pitre , Oleksij Rempel , Pieter-Paul Giesberts , QCA ath9k Development , =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , Sara Sharon , Shahar Patury , Stanislav Yakovlev , Stanislaw Gruszka , Tony Lindgren Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Kalle, On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Kalle Valo wrote: > Kalle Valo writes: > >> Julian Calaby writes: >> >>> This is a set of all patches in patchwork which were pending when the 4.6 >>> merge window opened that meet the following criteria: >>> >>> 1. They're sane >>> 2. They're either obviously correct, I can review them, or they've been >>> reviewed or ACK'd by someone else. >>> 3. They don't require any code changes to make them applyable. >>> >>> That said, if anyone doesn't like any of these patches for any reason, >>> just give me a reason and I'll drop it. >>> >>> I've split the pending patches into 4 sets as detailed below. All patches >>> have been rebased to apply in order on wireless-drivers-next at >>> wireless-drivers-next-for-davem-2016-03-14. >> >> Thank you for working on this, this is very helpful. >> >> I have deferred patch 14 and dropped patch 19[1], the rest I'm planning >> to apply soon. I also tried to remove the original patches from deferred >> queue by moving them to state "superseded", but I might missed >> something. I'll check that later and give you a list of patchwork URLs for anything you missed. >> [1] Oddly I cannot find patch 19 from patchwork, I don't know what >> happened to it. I do see it on the mailing list, though. > > Actually another nacked patch 16 also has disappeared from patchwork, so > I'm not going to apply that either. I'm starting to wonder that maybe > you removed these yourself from patchwork? I did do that: I updated both to "Rejected" when people NACKed them. Should I not have done that? I thought I was making things easier for you. Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@gmail.com Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/