Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36786 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754811AbcEaPED (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 May 2016 11:04:03 -0400 From: Jes Sorensen To: Dan Lenski Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: increase polling timeout for firmware startup References: <1463594249-19524-1-git-send-email-dlenski@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 11:04:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Jes Sorensen's message of "Wed, 18 May 2016 22:08:53 -0400") Message-ID: (sfid-20160531_170408_538913_6271760E) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jes Sorensen writes: > Dan Lenski writes: >> Here is a patch to increase the polling timeout for rtl8xxxu firmware >> startup. >> >> This patch now applies cleanly to Jes Sorensen's rtl8xxxu-devel tree >> (86c89dd4782030c4f9e0c82424a8b92f9fdb35aa). >> >> The patch to make this a module parameter was removed. >> >> Dan Lenski (1): >> rtl8xxxu: Increase default polling timeout for firmware startup >> >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu.h | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Dan, > > Thanks for the patch, I'll apply it shortly. Dan, Given your follow-on discoveries, do you still want me to apply the poll timeout patch, or should we wait until we nail down the reset code issue first? Cheers, Jes