Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:58940 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932102AbcF3PEq (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2016 11:04:46 -0400 Message-ID: <1467299025.14836.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20160630_170527_261148_26655A6E) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] wlcore: Add support for get_expected_throughput opcode From: Johannes Berg To: Maxim Altshul , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Kalle Valo , Eliad Peller , Arik Nemtsov , Yaniv Machani , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 17:03:45 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20160630145534.26052-1-maxim.altshul@ti.com> (sfid-20160630_165356_857494_C1EF09DF) References: <20160630145534.26052-1-maxim.altshul@ti.com> (sfid-20160630_165356_857494_C1EF09DF) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 17:49 +0300, Maxim Altshul wrote: > Adding this opcode, allows the TI wireless driver, > to report throughput directly from FW to mac80211. > > This is used mainly for mesh metric calculation. > > Signed-off-by: Maxim Altshul > --- > Changed the units of returned value. > drv_get_expected_throughput returns units of Kbps  > by definition, and thus we must comply as well. > Mbps * 1000 = Kbps. > >  drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c > b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c > index 39dec7d..cb1103b 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c > @@ -5851,6 +5851,20 @@ out: >   mutex_unlock(&wl->mutex); >  } >   > +static u32 wlcore_op_get_expected_throughput(struct ieee80211_sta > *sta) > +{ > + struct wl1271_station *wl_sta = (struct wl1271_station > *)sta->drv_priv; > + struct wl1271 *wl = wl_sta->wl; > + u8 hlid = wl_sta->hlid; > + u32 ret = 0; > + > + /* return in units of Kbps */ > + if (wl) > + ret = (wl->links[hlid].fw_rate_mbps * 1000); > + I don't see how wl can ever be NULL? Also, you can certainly remove the 'ret' variable. johannes