Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:37774 "EHLO mail-wm0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750899AbcFRTca (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Jun 2016 15:32:30 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id a66so28447560wme.0 for ; Sat, 18 Jun 2016 12:32:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] brcmfmac: support removing AP interfaces with "interface_remove" To: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , Kalle Valo References: <1466273932-11554-1-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> <1466273932-11554-2-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> Cc: Franky Lin , Hante Meuleman , Pieter-Paul Giesberts , "Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" , "open list:BROADCOM BRCM80211 IEEE802.11n WIRELESS DRIVER" , "open list:BROADCOM BRCM80211 IEEE802.11n WIRELESS DRIVER" , "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" , open list From: Arend van Spriel Message-ID: <5765A1CB.9060700@broadcom.com> (sfid-20160618_213310_982873_7A9927A2) Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 21:32:27 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1466273932-11554-2-git-send-email-zajec5@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 18-06-16 20:18, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > New firmwares (e.g. 10.10.69.36 for BCM4366) support "interface_remove" > for removing interfaces. Try to use this method on cfg80211 request. In > case of older firmwares (e.g. 7.35.177.56 for BCM43602 as I tested) this > will just result in firmware rejecting command and this won't change any > behavior. > > Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki > --- > .../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c > index 502b0a0..aff76c2 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c > @@ -785,12 +785,46 @@ s32 brcmf_notify_escan_complete(struct brcmf_cfg80211_info *cfg, > return err; > } > > +static int brcmf_cfg80211_del_ap_iface(struct wiphy *wiphy, > + struct wireless_dev *wdev) > +{ > + struct brcmf_cfg80211_info *cfg = wiphy_priv(wiphy); > + struct net_device *ndev = wdev->netdev; > + struct brcmf_if *ifp = netdev_priv(ndev); > + int ret; > + int err; > + > + brcmf_cfg80211_arm_vif_event(cfg, ifp->vif); > + > + err = brcmf_fil_bsscfg_data_set(ifp, "interface_remove", NULL, 0); > + if (err) { > + brcmf_err("interface_remove failed %d\n", err); > + goto err_unarm; > + } > + > + /* wait for firmware event */ > + ret = brcmf_cfg80211_wait_vif_event(cfg, BRCMF_E_IF_DEL, > + BRCMF_VIF_EVENT_TIMEOUT); > + if (!ret) { > + brcmf_err("timeout occurred\n"); > + err = -EIO; > + goto err_unarm; > + } > + > +err_unarm: > + brcmf_cfg80211_arm_vif_event(cfg, NULL); > + return err; > +} > + > static > int brcmf_cfg80211_del_iface(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct wireless_dev *wdev) > { > struct brcmf_cfg80211_info *cfg = wiphy_priv(wiphy); > struct net_device *ndev = wdev->netdev; > > + if (ndev == cfg_to_ndev(cfg)) ndev can be NULL, ie. for IFTYPE_P2P_DEVICE. Regards, Arend > + return -ENOTSUPP; > + > /* vif event pending in firmware */ > if (brcmf_cfg80211_vif_event_armed(cfg)) > return -EBUSY; > @@ -807,12 +841,13 @@ int brcmf_cfg80211_del_iface(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct wireless_dev *wdev) > switch (wdev->iftype) { > case NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC: > case NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION: > - case NL80211_IFTYPE_AP: > case NL80211_IFTYPE_AP_VLAN: > case NL80211_IFTYPE_WDS: > case NL80211_IFTYPE_MONITOR: > case NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT: > return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + case NL80211_IFTYPE_AP: > + return brcmf_cfg80211_del_ap_iface(wiphy, wdev); > case NL80211_IFTYPE_P2P_CLIENT: > case NL80211_IFTYPE_P2P_GO: > case NL80211_IFTYPE_P2P_DEVICE: >