Return-path: Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]:40684 "EHLO mail2.candelatech.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752023AbcFJTru (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:47:50 -0400 Received: from [192.168.100.149] (firewall.candelatech.com [50.251.239.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.candelatech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 478E840A959 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:47:49 -0700 (PDT) To: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" From: Ben Greear Subject: NL80211_ATTR_PAD question Message-ID: <575B1964.2030806@candelatech.com> (sfid-20160610_214753_670799_49B46ECD) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:47:48 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I see this was added sometime recently: NL80211_ATTR_PAD If another enum member is added, should it replace the PAD enum? At the least, I think we need some comments about how this is to be dealt with. Thanks, Ben -- Ben Greear Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com