Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:35560 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750772AbcFIW6E (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2016 18:58:04 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 17:57:58 -0500 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Lukas Wunner Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Milsted , Matthew Garrett , Andi Kleen , Michael Buesch , Bjorn Helgaas , Matt Fleming , Konstantin Simanov , Bryan Paradis , Andrew Worsley , Chris Bainbridge , Linus Torvalds , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, zajec5@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Add early quirk to reset Apple AirPort card Message-ID: <20160609225758.GC19309@localhost> (sfid-20160610_005825_256568_531E9354) References: <82c2548dffc6cfbc484b9111b1073f407c946061.1464477483.git.lukas@wunner.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <82c2548dffc6cfbc484b9111b1073f407c946061.1464477483.git.lukas@wunner.de> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 01:35:28AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > The EFI firmware on Macs contains a full-fledged network stack for > downloading OS X images from osrecovery.apple.com. Unfortunately > on Macs introduced 2011 and 2012, EFI brings up the Broadcom 4331 > wireless card on every boot and leaves it enabled even after > ExitBootServices has been called. The card continues to assert its IRQ > line, causing spurious interrupts if the IRQ is shared. It also corrupts > memory by DMAing received packets, allowing for remote code execution > over the air. This only stops when a driver is loaded for the wireless > card, which may be never if the driver is not installed or blacklisted. > ... > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79301 > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111781 > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728916 > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895951#c16 > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1009819 > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098621 > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149632#c5 > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279130 > Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332732 I think I saw mail about this being applied via the x86 tree. Let me know if I need to do anything more here.