Return-path: Received: from mail-it0-f51.google.com ([209.85.214.51]:37111 "EHLO mail-it0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752758AbcHZKs7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:48:59 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f51.google.com with SMTP id d65so18437231ith.0 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 03:48:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160826102250.24174-1-rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> References: <20160826102250.24174-1-rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> From: Dave Taht Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 03:48:42 -0700 Message-ID: (sfid-20160826_124913_305753_49D4FF3C) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ath10k: implement NAPI support To: Rajkumar Manoharan Cc: ath10k , linux-wireless , Rajkumar Manoharan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I'm always rather big on people testing latency under load, and napi tends to add some.