Return-path: Received: from smtprelay0043.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.43]:50225 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752059AbcHVQWx (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2016 12:22:53 -0400 Message-ID: <1471882737.3746.55.camel@perches.com> (sfid-20160822_182301_459226_CE36B387) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] hostap: Fine-tuning for a few functions From: Joe Perches To: Kalle Valo , Arend van Spriel Cc: SF Markus Elfring , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jouni Malinen , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:18:57 -0700 In-Reply-To: <87shtwvm63.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <3b3c91ad-3225-3483-bb58-fdee33bf2290@broadcom.com> <87shtwvm63.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 18:49 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Arend van Spriel writes: [] > But yeah, not really sure what to do with these obsolete drivers like > hostap, ray_cs and wl3501. Maybe marking sections obsolete in MAINTAINERS could flag some "shouldn't touch this" warning for old code in checkpatch.pl and/or get_maintainer.pl