Return-path: Received: from mail-lf0-f67.google.com ([209.85.215.67]:33513 "EHLO mail-lf0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752831AbcI0JOm (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2016 05:14:42 -0400 From: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= To: Kalle Valo Cc: Arend van Spriel , Franky Lin , Hante Meuleman , Pieter-Paul Giesberts , Franky Lin , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= Subject: [PATCH 4.9] brcmfmac: use correct skb freeing helper when deleting flowring Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 11:14:28 +0200 Message-Id: <20160927091428.19223-1-zajec5@gmail.com> (sfid-20160927_111458_177981_A8852189) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Rafał Miłecki Flowrings contain skbs waiting for transmission that were passed to us by netif. It means we checked every one of them looking for 802.1x Ethernet type. When deleting flowring we have to use freeing function that will check for 802.1x type as well. Freeing skbs without a proper check was leading to counter not being properly decreased. This was triggering a WARNING every time brcmf_netdev_wait_pend8021x was called. Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki --- Kalle: this isn't important enough for 4.8 as it's too late for that. I'd like to get it for 4.9 however, as this fixes bug that could lead to WARNING on every add_key/del_key call. We was struggling with these WARNINGs for some time and this fixes one of two problems causing them. --- drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/flowring.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/flowring.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/flowring.c index b16b367..d0b738d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/flowring.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/flowring.c @@ -234,13 +234,20 @@ static void brcmf_flowring_block(struct brcmf_flowring *flow, u16 flowid, void brcmf_flowring_delete(struct brcmf_flowring *flow, u16 flowid) { + struct brcmf_bus *bus_if = dev_get_drvdata(flow->dev); struct brcmf_flowring_ring *ring; + struct brcmf_if *ifp; u16 hash_idx; + u8 ifidx; struct sk_buff *skb; ring = flow->rings[flowid]; if (!ring) return; + + ifidx = brcmf_flowring_ifidx_get(flow, flowid); + ifp = brcmf_get_ifp(bus_if->drvr, ifidx); + brcmf_flowring_block(flow, flowid, false); hash_idx = ring->hash_id; flow->hash[hash_idx].ifidx = BRCMF_FLOWRING_INVALID_IFIDX; @@ -249,7 +256,7 @@ void brcmf_flowring_delete(struct brcmf_flowring *flow, u16 flowid) skb = skb_dequeue(&ring->skblist); while (skb) { - brcmu_pkt_buf_free_skb(skb); + brcmf_txfinalize(ifp, skb, false); skb = skb_dequeue(&ring->skblist); } -- 2.9.3