Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:42111 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750967AbcINGGP (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 02:06:15 -0400 Message-ID: <1473833168.4423.3.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20160914_080651_574258_44FD74B5) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: allow driver to handle packet-loss mechanism From: Johannes Berg To: Rajkumar Manoharan Cc: Rajkumar Manoharan , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:06:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20160906065624.4062-1-rmanohar@qti.qualcomm.com> <1473684288.29016.38.camel@sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > The way you describe this it sounds like somehow you'll be > > reporting the indication to userspace from the driver; but you do > > not, and cannot do that. The description seems thus misleading? > > > Sorry for confusion.. The idea is that driver will report low ack > status by ieee80211_report_low_ack and if driver wants to completely > rely on firmware algorithm, then this flag will be used to bypass > mac80211 packet loss mechanism. does it make sense? Oh, so you *can* already do that. Please just say that in the commit message. johannes