Return-path: Received: from smtprelay0175.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.175]:55608 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965133AbcIXRrf (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Sep 2016 13:47:35 -0400 Message-ID: <1474739251.23838.15.camel@perches.com> (sfid-20160924_194752_408247_B3779954) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtlwifi: Add HAL_DEF_WOWLAN case to *_get_hw() routines From: Joe Perches To: Larry Finger , kvalo@codeaurora.org Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 10:47:31 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1474736239-9826-2-git-send-email-Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> References: <1474736239-9826-1-git-send-email-Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> <1474736239-9826-2-git-send-email-Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2016-09-24 at 11:57 -0500, Larry Finger wrote: > Only rtl8821ae implements WOWLAN; however, the other drivers may receive > a call requesting information about this mode. The other drivers need to > ignore the request rather than logging that the default branch of the > switch statement has been reached. How about later rationalizing the DBG_EMERG vs DBG_LOUD differences too? > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/hw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/hw.c [] > @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ void rtl88ee_get_hw_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u8 variable, u8 *val) [] > ? default: > ? RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_ERR, DBG_EMERG, > ? "switch case %#x not processed\n", variable); [] > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8723ae/hw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8723ae/hw.c [] > @@ -141,6 +141,8 @@ void rtl8723e_get_hw_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u8 variable, u8 *val) [] > ? default: > ? RT_TRACE(rtlpriv, COMP_ERR, DBG_LOUD, > ? "switch case %#x not processed\n", variable); etc...