Return-path: Received: from mail-it0-f66.google.com ([209.85.214.66]:33833 "EHLO mail-it0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752791AbcIDDWl (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Sep 2016 23:22:41 -0400 Received: by mail-it0-f66.google.com with SMTP id e124so5809550ith.1 for ; Sat, 03 Sep 2016 20:22:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160811103816.1695-1-maxim.altshul@ti.com> References: <20160811103816.1695-1-maxim.altshul@ti.com> From: Julian Calaby Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 13:22:20 +1000 Message-ID: (sfid-20160904_052245_487368_766E1072) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add protection to get_expected_throughput opcode To: Maxim Altshul Cc: Johannes Berg , linux-wireless Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Maxim, On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Maxim Altshul wrote: > The patch is done with respect to the patch that was applied: > [PATCH v3] mac80211: mesh: Add support for HW RC implementation > > 1. Patch adds protection as we discussed > 2. Patch changes the function call that is made in the mesh patch > to comply with the change. > > Maxim Altshul (1): > mac80211: Add protection to get_expected_throughput opcode > > net/mac80211/driver-ops.h | 8 ++++---- > net/mac80211/sta_info.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Where's the patch? Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@gmail.com Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/