Return-path: Received: from packetmixer.de ([79.140.42.25]:53933 "EHLO mail.mail.packetmixer.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754071AbcISGoE (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Sep 2016 02:44:04 -0400 From: Simon Wunderlich To: ath10k@lists.infradead.org Cc: "Pedersen, Thomas" , "Valo, Kalle" , Martin Blumenstingl , "openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: ath10k mesh + ap + encryption? Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 08:43:56 +0200 Message-ID: <5898628.mmcCycDigQ@prime> (sfid-20160919_084417_033104_4BC39FBB) In-Reply-To: <1473789271.27738.4.camel@qca.qualcomm.com> References: <2661831.slnB0LOeVt@prime> <3247815.ey5ZWkP5uX@prime> <1473789271.27738.4.camel@qca.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2820425.r2kv2YZJnq"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --nextPart2820425.r2kv2YZJnq Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 5:54:38 PM CEST Pedersen, Thomas wrote: > On Tue, 2016-09-13 at 14:30 +0200, Simon Wunderlich wrote: > > > [...] > > > > Thanks for the clarification. We will then stick to the 70's branch > > then. > > > > Does anyone have pointers for the other questions? :) I would believe > > hat many > > people would be interested in running AP + Mesh encrypted at the same > > time (at > > least in the open source community ...). > > > We're testing encrypted AP + Mesh quite successfully right now with > this firmware: https://github.com/kvalo/ath10k-firmware/commit/307cb46b > 06661ebd3186723b5002de769c7add83, of course that is for a QCA4019 chip. > Which chip are you using? I can poke the firmware guys for possibility > of getting a 10.4.3.2 firmware build for it. Hi Thomas, thanks for the hint! We are using an older QCA9882. I assume your firmware will not work for this one? If you can poke the firmware guys, that would be great. :) We also want to test the 70.52 firmware version next, maybe there were some changes since the .42 we used. Thanks, Simon --nextPart2820425.r2kv2YZJnq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAABCgAGBQJX34ksAAoJEKEr45hCkp6hHp4QAIEaCR9yk5w6O7jhSA+kxwPT 8AgwXibVWWvDb4oURxey5SxuvDY2AJ3L35Yk1tvm4FOprrUZaHP+9+yOJrBO7RXw XCl+oeANjFPugoFHtkxQgzdmgqfYhb4RROCzUH8DEShgr44PK+EZyR8FkVBstVHr 90iooQ6qCQBVlxD3TfZlX4kMlz7jAl+COXkrEYWiCcnB5fH6mMttMoSdWhkNmMaH S2VbuU/6NDPoSX0YLjEBhuFAvBaS8NUQU3fSGZKuypZqXz9uG5wJ+FC6ky5AEmX2 MlL/MS9jgeHflSvnB3O6l2ST4Gt7e8S4Ftq0G0GkOGYXjjVhK+5rRjbshRimhxNn gf3qttQXLO3fC50QIxZlVztRhiZoi+JgO3HiQpKTH7gcRCkQJllhUI0aEO+qZHrd VqV7ExRpX6QBNVmhdpeKiVtW5BUbEg8fwrczdYxGvzhnN9r89RPZyo7pik0x8EId 3eQiKBUssZztAgA+KYp/NSAus3w48B+dvUsIkWboonRcYaebWLOvZWkqQmnN+Vme /1VEVFNa3sIImYIoS0jRAw+m0n4gilM9GXFK2XPW9SS8DnDc6ffoIrDQieeIG4Xp VXT59AadhL8566Fjyg8udZGXRXVKnAKJOHZ66BTpL+9G5jLe7+NxtkQ+xkEXAKpP WtBHyQwElTEjzjLGBm2N =9jHP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2820425.r2kv2YZJnq--