Return-path: Received: from mail-qk0-f181.google.com ([209.85.220.181]:38505 "EHLO mail-qk0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752848AbcJXURG (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:17:06 -0400 Received: by mail-qk0-f181.google.com with SMTP id v138so7455613qka.5 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:17:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1477286912.4085.1.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <1477286912.4085.1.camel@sipsolutions.net> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Smedman?= Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:17:04 +0200 Message-ID: (sfid-20161024_221710_189489_49FBE8B5) Subject: Re: Bayesian rate control To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Johannes, Thanks for the pointers. On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: >> I'm thinking the best driver for rate control experimentation would >> be ath9k, right? If so then a TP-Link TL-WA901ND router (apparently >> based on Qualcomm QCA956x SOC) with OpenWrt, and a TP-Link TL-WDN4800 >> PCIe card (apparently based on Atheros AR9380 with PCI ID 168c:0030) >> for my desktop sounds like a good combo, no? > > Seems reasonable, yes. You wouldn't have VHT, but HT has enough search > space to keep you busy ;-) Are there any cards out there that support VHT and use s/w rate control (Minstrel)? Just in case I run out of search space. :P BR Bj=C3=B6rn