Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:49508 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757095AbcJQJji (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Oct 2016 05:39:38 -0400 Message-ID: <1476697144.19992.16.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20161017_113942_519098_237D2AC3) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211_hwsim: suggest nl80211 instead of wext driver in documentation From: Johannes Berg To: Linus =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=FCssing?= , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Jouni Malinen Cc: "David S . Miller" , Jonathan Corbet , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:39:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20161016223933.9484-1-linus.luessing@c0d3.blue> References: <20161016223933.9484-1-linus.luessing@c0d3.blue> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2016-10-17 at 00:39 +0200, Linus Lüssing wrote: > For mac80211_hwsim interfaces, suggest to use wpa_supplicant with the > more modern, netlink based driver instead of wext. Makes sense, applied. > Actually, I wasn't even able to make a connection with the > configuration > files and information provided in > Documentation/networking/mac80211_hwsim/{README,hostapd.conf/wpa_supp > licant.conf} > This less so, we even have a few test cases we run regularly, but I don't know. Maybe there's something special in those configuration files that we don't test for otherwise. johannes