Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:34891 "EHLO mail-wm0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755781AbcJVTRg (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Oct 2016 15:17:36 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id c78so39357405wme.0 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:17:35 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] cfg80211: add add_nan_func / del_nan_func To: johannes@sipsolutions.net References: <20160920143121.28247-1-luca@coelho.fi> <20160920143121.28247-4-luca@coelho.fi> Cc: Luca Coelho , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ayala.beker@intel.com, andrei.otcheretianski@intel.com, Emmanuel Grumbach , Luca Coelho From: Arend van Spriel Message-ID: <6fb30815-b8c8-aff4-86af-d7f496da91b5@broadcom.com> (sfid-20161022_211738_254386_517227D5) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 21:17:20 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160920143121.28247-4-luca@coelho.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 20-09-16 16:31, Luca Coelho wrote: > + .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM, Hi Johannes, Recently the nl80211_ops flags were changed to GENL_UNS_ADMIN_PERM so should the NAN commands use that as well? Regards, Arend