Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail2.tohojo.dk ([77.235.48.147]:44758 "EHLO mail2.tohojo.dk"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1753530AbcJEQzi (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 5 Oct 2016 12:55:38 -0400
From: =?utf-8?Q?Toke_H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
        make-wifi-fast@lists.bufferbloat.net, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org,
        Tim Shepard <shep@alum.mit.edu>, Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ath9k: Switch to using mac80211 intermediate software
        queues.
References: <20160706193417.13080-1-toke@toke.dk>
        <20160805160346.10545-1-toke@toke.dk>
        <87mvk44xmt.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> <87bn0k4w4d.fsf@toke.dk>
        <87fupwvisn.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <871t1g4thz.fsf@toke.dk>
        <877fb8ug0x.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> <87k2dm6git.fsf@toke.dk>
        <878tu2okv7.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 18:55:33 +0200
In-Reply-To: <878tu2okv7.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (Kalle Valo's message
        of "Wed, 05 Oct 2016 18:50:52 +0300")
Message-ID: <87d1jeenwa.fsf@toke.dk> (sfid-20161005_185548_399334_2B7360E6)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> writes:

> Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen <toke@toke.dk> writes:
>
>> Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> writes:
>>
>>> Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen <toke@toke.dk> writes:
>>>
>>> I understand your point, but I don't want to rush this to 4.9 and then
>>> start getting lots of bug reports and eventually forced to revert it. If
>>> we just found a new serious regression the chances are that there are
>>> more lurking somewhere and this patch is just not ready yet.
>>
>> So, the changes to mac80211 that fixes the known regressions of this
>> patch have gone in.
>
> I guess you mean this commit:
>
> bb42f2d13ffc mac80211: Move reorder-sensitive TX handlers to after TXQ de=
queue
>
> (Just making sure that I have the same commit in my tree when I apply
> this)

Yup, that's the one :)

>> Any chance of seeing this merged during the current merge window? :)
>
> I sent last new feature ("-next") patches for 4.9 last week, sorry. So
> this has to wait for 4.10.

Ah, right, I think I got my merge windows confused. You already said you
wouldn't take it for 4.9. So I guess what I'm asking is for you to put
it into the appropriate -next tree so it can get some wider exposure
ahead of the *next* merge window...

> And I assume I need to take v5:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9311037/

Yes. Haven't noticed anything that changed since that might conflict
with it, but let me know if I missed something and you want a refreshed
version.

-Toke