Return-path: Received: from mail-it0-f67.google.com ([209.85.214.67]:33440 "EHLO mail-it0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932297AbcKPEp3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 23:45:29 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-f67.google.com with SMTP id c20so4943086itb.0 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 20:45:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1479202467.12007.26.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <1477286912.4085.1.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1477379678.4390.2.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1477461362.4059.17.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1479202467.12007.26.camel@sipsolutions.net> From: Adrian Chadd Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 20:45:27 -0800 Message-ID: (sfid-20161116_054533_033780_B0BD4C64) Subject: Re: Bayesian rate control To: Johannes Berg Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Smedman?= , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , ath9k-devel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 15 November 2016 at 01:34, Johannes Berg wrote: > >> But there is a per-descriptor TX rate table entry in the driver. >> FreeBSD uses it to implement its rate control for the intel drivers. >> >> What am I missing? :) > > Not sure. But there isn't a per-descriptor table in the driver. There's > a per-station table, that *can* be used in similar ways, but at least > in Linux none of the APIs are hooked up to the general implementation, > it's all driver/device-specific code, so it'd be very painful to try to > experiment with. Ok. well, we do that. :) I'll let you know how well it works when I'm doing 11ac with the 7260 driver. -adrian