Return-path: Received: from mail-qt0-f169.google.com ([209.85.216.169]:34105 "EHLO mail-qt0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752013AbcKGMBW (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2016 07:01:22 -0500 Received: by mail-qt0-f169.google.com with SMTP id n6so85515586qtd.1 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 04:01:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87twbnueqv.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> References: <773DB8A82AB6A046AE0195C68612A31901C5B293@sbs2003.acksys.local> <566849DB.9040901@candelatech.com> <079401d132a6$7e7e2050$7b7a60f0$@acksys.fr> <87twbnueqv.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> From: Bruno Antunes Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 12:01:01 +0000 Message-ID: (sfid-20161107_130126_641470_6F7496C0) Subject: Re: ATH10K VLAN firmware issue To: "Valo, Kalle" Cc: voncken , OpenWrt Development List , linux-wireless , "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 4 November 2016 at 21:17, Valo, Kalle wrote: > Bruno Antunes writes: > >> Old thread but I think the issue is still present. >> >> I'm running a setup with VLANs with WDS and ath10k cards. >> >> To make it work both cards must be loaded in rawmode, AP >> and Sta, and with no security. >> >> I'm using a OpenWrt trunk r49941 and the most recent firmware, >> 10.2.4.70.58, from Kalle ath10k firmware tree. >> >> Although it works the throughput is very bad. >> Are there any alternatives to improve the throughput. > > Can someone file a bug to bugzilla about this so that all the info is > properly stored? The more comprehensive the report is the better. > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ I will file a bug report. But since it appears to be a firmware related issue under what category can fill in the bug? Thanks, Bruno > > -- > Kalle Valo