Return-path: Received: from smtp-out03.msg.oleane.net ([62.161.7.1]:42813 "EHLO smtp-out03.msg.oleane.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755815AbcK3KkL (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Nov 2016 05:40:11 -0500 Received: from smtp04.msg.oleane.net ([172.17.20.113]) by smtp-out03.msg.oleane.net with ESMTP id uAUAe7M9003605 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:40:08 +0100 Received: from RD8 ([195.6.104.67]) (authenticated) by smtp04.msg.oleane.net (MSA) with ESMTP id uAUAJaVT027727 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:19:36 +0100 From: "voncken" To: Subject: Atheros ETSI DFS pattern Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:19:36 +0100 Message-ID: <012101d24af3$40bb97f0$c232c7d0$@acksys.fr> (sfid-20161130_114015_897243_AD19DB98) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: In the file drivers/net/wireless/ath/dfs_pattern_detector.c we can found the ETSI pattern definition. In this definition we can found 7 patterns (0 to 6). The ETSI standard EN 301893 Annex D only specifies 6 patterns. Only the pattern 1 to 6 defined in the ath dfs pattern match with the ETSI standard. Why the pattern 0 is defined? Is it possible to remove this pattern and keep compliant with the ETSI standard? Thanks for your help. Cedric.