Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:40963 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752738AbcLSDHf (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Dec 2016 22:07:35 -0500 Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 20:07:33 -0700 From: Mark Greer To: Geoff Lansberry Cc: linux-wireless , Lauro Ramos Venancio , Aloisio Almeida Jr , Samuel Ortiz , Justin Bronder Subject: Re: [Patch] NFC: trf7970a: Message-ID: <20161219030733.GA14962@animalcreek.com> (sfid-20161219_040831_038721_56B4E02F) References: <20161213220545.GA29317@animalcreek.com> <20161214155743.GA22282@animalcreek.com> <20161214171010.GA29321@animalcreek.com> <20161214223123.GA10281@animalcreek.com> <20161216045210.GA29196@animalcreek.com> <20161216203538.GA12608@animalcreek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 04:19:04PM -0500, Geoff Lansberry wrote: > Mark, from our consultant: > > It isn't important whether the flood script is successful in writing > or not. The point of it is to force a segfault by making many > requests. It needs to run for several hundred iterations (successful > or not) in order to generate the segfault. So neard crashes even when the write fails?? Okay, I'll let it run for a while tomorrow (Monday). Thanks, Mark --