Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([5.9.151.49]:35238 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933987AbdADNcR (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jan 2017 08:32:17 -0500 Message-ID: <1483536734.7312.7.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20170104_144828_726570_D1E677E1) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cfg80211: Add support to sched scan to report better BSSs From: Johannes Berg To: Arend Van Spriel , "Malinen, Jouni" Cc: "Vamsi, Krishna" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 14:32:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20161221_101814_323016_46561D57) References: <1480715949-20169-1-git-send-email-jouni@qca.qualcomm.com> <1480715949-20169-2-git-send-email-jouni@qca.qualcomm.com> <1481102727.4092.34.camel@sipsolutions.net> <280cb669-2360-d4fc-779b-80196c944e2e@broadcom.com> <20161208175236.GA6121@jouni.qca.qualcomm.com> <63343007-2245-1861-94fd-bdda0de2f7dc@broadcom.com> <1481644615.20412.25.camel@sipsolutions.net> <20161215110635.GA11840@jouni.qca.qualcomm.com> <1481882211.27953.18.camel@sipsolutions.net> <20161220205221.GB9756@jouni.qca.qualcomm.com> (sfid-20161221_101814_323016_46561D57) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Also I don't see the array issue. @relative_rssi_5g_pref with s8 > value seems same as @rssi_adjust with (band=5g, s8 value) packed > together. Or am I missing something here. Jouni is arguing that if you can specify which band to adjust, you might want to adjust more than one band - and need an array of (band,adjustment) rather than just a single such tuple. But if we introduce this attribute with the tuple now, we can extend it to an array of tuples later if we really need that. johannes