Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-f67.google.com ([209.85.218.67]:35209 "EHLO mail-oi0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935166AbdAGMxF (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jan 2017 07:53:05 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1483707597.12677.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <20170104175832.25996-1-zajec5@gmail.com> <1483617089.4394.13.camel@sipsolutions.net> <1483707597.12677.0.camel@sipsolutions.net> From: =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 13:53:04 +0100 Message-ID: (sfid-20170107_135308_822131_67BDF55A) Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/3] dt-bindings: document common IEEE 802.11 frequency limit property To: Johannes Berg Cc: Rob Herring , linux-wireless , Martin Blumenstingl , Felix Fietkau , Arend van Spriel , Arnd Bergmann , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , =?UTF-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 6 January 2017 at 13:59, Johannes Berg wrote= : > On Thu, 2017-01-05 at 10:34 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 5:51 AM, Johannes Berg > net> wrote: >> > >> > > Acked-by: Rob Herring >> > >> > Do I take that to mean that we'll merge it through the subsystem >> > tree, >> > and not go through some common DT tree? >> >> Yes, that's generally the case when bindings are in a series with >> driver changes. > > Alright, thanks. > > I've applied patches 1-3, patch 4 obviously still needs work (and > probably won't go through my tree anyway.) > > Note that I made some documentation fixes in patch 3, Rafa=C5=82, please > check. Looks great, thanks everyone for your help on getting this patchset in shap= e! --=20 Rafa=C5=82