Return-path: Received: from mail-oi0-f43.google.com ([209.85.218.43]:36573 "EHLO mail-oi0-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760234AbdACSgL (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:36:11 -0500 Received: by mail-oi0-f43.google.com with SMTP id v84so516860106oie.3 for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:35:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170103163324.GA3184@animalcreek.com> References: <1482380314-16440-1-git-send-email-geoff@kuvee.com> <1482380314-16440-3-git-send-email-geoff@kuvee.com> <20161224060141.GA9069@animalcreek.com> <20161224172439.GA15103@animalcreek.com> <20170103163324.GA3184@animalcreek.com> From: Geoff Lansberry Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:35:18 -0500 Message-ID: (sfid-20170103_193706_961337_FA27CBD0) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] nfc: trf7970a: Prevent repeated polling from crashing the kernel To: Mark Greer Cc: linux-wireless , Lauro Ramos Venancio , Aloisio Almeida Jr , Samuel Ortiz , robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Justin Bronder , Jaret Cantu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Mark Greer wrote: > [Please stop top-posting. Bottom-post only to these lists.] Sorry; gmail keeps baiting me to do it... > > Hi Geoff & happy new year. > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 09:18:32AM -0500, Geoff Lansberry wrote: >> Mark - I will split this off soon. > > OK Thanks for the reminder! > >> In the meantime - here is some more info about how we use it. >> >> We do use NFC structures. I did find an interesting clue in that >> there are certain bottles that cause neard to segfault, I'm not sure >> what is different about them. We write a string, like >> "coppola_chardonnay_2015" to the bottles. > > Off the top of my head, it could be the length of the text. > It would be useful to compare the data that works to the data > that doesn't work. Can you install NXP's 'TagInfo' app on a > smartphone and scan tags with working & non-working data? > You can email the data from the app to yourself, edit out > the cruft, and share here. The data is always the same - and the tags are all the same. Only difference is that the tag is physically different, and perhaps orientation; distance from antenna to tag is fixed. I can't even write the tags at all, so reading them will show blank. Also a minor but significant detail, is that the tags are embedded in such a way that the phone cannot get close enough to them to connect. > >> Come to think of it, I >> haven't done anything special to make that an ndef record, just >> assumed that it would happen by default, I'll look into this further. > > If you wrote the data using neard, it will be NDEF formatted. > Since it is working this well, it is virtually guaranteed that > the data is NDEF formatted. OK, good. > >> Also, I've been running neard with --plugin nfctype2. Just in case >> the problem was happening due to cycling through other tag types. It >> didn't seem to make any difference, but I have not gone back to >> default. > > Good to know, thanks. > > Mark > --