Return-path: Received: from mail-pg0-f53.google.com ([74.125.83.53]:36461 "EHLO mail-pg0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751498AbdBTLDt (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2017 06:03:49 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id s67so6870431pgb.3 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 03:02:57 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [RFC V3 0/5] cfg80211: support multiple scheduled scans To: Johannes Berg References: <1487155049-1892-1-git-send-email-arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> <1487582393.5474.2.camel@sipsolutions.net> Cc: linux-wireless From: Arend Van Spriel Message-ID: <1404cf52-b570-3dfb-031b-ba8eaa28ace1@broadcom.com> (sfid-20170220_120353_836995_84122417) Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:55:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1487582393.5474.2.camel@sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 20-2-2017 10:19, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 10:37 +0000, Arend van Spriel wrote: >> Another review round for multiple scheduled scan support in nl80211. >> > > > Looks fine to me. Not sure I see much value in splitting patches 4/5, > but whichever you prefer is fine with me. I was a bit in doubt on granularity of the patches. Let's see what I make of it when submitting a formal patch ;-) > Maybe some of the commit messages ("It mainly illustrates ...") could > use some rewording :) Will do. Thanks, Arend